메뉴 건너뛰기

S+ in K 4 JP

QnA 質疑応答

?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
The Louisiana Supreme Court has revived a lawsuit between a middle school librarian and furious parents who accused her of promoting pornography and 'erotic content' to children.

Amanda Jones, the school librarian at Live Oak Middle School, sued the Citizens for a New Louisiana, its leader Michael Lunsford, and parent Ryan Thames for defamation in 2022.

Her lawsuit, seen by DailyMail.com, claimed they publicly accused her of promoting porn and 'erotic contents' to minors by placing 'inappropriate' books in the 'kid's section' of her library.

The controversial books involved in the argument include 'Dating and Sex: A Guide for the 21st Century Teen Boy' by Andrew P. Smiler and 'Let's Talk About It: The Teen's Guide to Sex, Relationships, and Being a Human' by Erika Moen and Matthew Nolan, according to Lunsford.

The lawsuit was dismissed that same year, but Jones' appeal reached the state supreme court who overruled the judgment on Friday - sending the case back to the court of appeals to reconsider.

'Before all this, I was just a school librarian, but they wanted to silence me, so I thought I would do the exact opposite and become an activist,' Jones told The New York Times.

'What we're seeing now is full-scale attacks on people's characters if they stand up for books. The hate level and the vitriol is unreal to me.' 

The ordeal began when Jones spoke out about book bans at the Livingston Parish Library board meeting on July 19, 2022. She immediately faced backlash - and people online started targeting her for 'defending the literature.' 




Librarian Amanda Jones (pictured) was accused of promoting pornography and 'erotic content' to kids





Jones sued Citizens for a New Louisiana its leader Michael Lunsford (pictured) for defamation after they posted on social media claiming she was exposing kids sexualized material

At the meeting, a board member expressed her concerns about books for children and teens that had 'inappropriate' content.

During the public comment section of the meeting, Jones criticized banning books from the library without naming specific titles.

She said: 'Just because you don't want to read it or see it does not give you the right to deny others or demand its relocation.

'If we remove or relocate books with L.G.B.T.Q. or sexual health content, what message is that sending to our community members?'

Within days, Jones said her social media was flooded with posts accusing her of sexualizing children. 

'Here is Amanda Jones at the Livingston Parish Library board meeting on Tuesday, July 19, 2022,' Citizens for a New Louisiana wrote in a Facebook post provided to Law&Crime. 

'Why is she fighting so hard to keep sexually erotic and pornographic materials in the kid's section?' The content in question is so very terrible that The Advocate (Baton Rouge, LA) won't even print it! … What kind of influence would she have over what your six-year-old kindergartner sees in your local SCHOOL's library?'

Another post accused Jones of 'advocating teaching anal sex to 11-year-olds,' according to The Times.

The online abuse triggered Jones to launch the legal battle - as she admitted that two years on, she still can't leave her home to buy groceries because of the alleged defamation.  




Jones faced backlash from the community when she spoke out about book bans at the Livingston Parish Library board meeting on July 19, 2022





The controversial books included 'Let's Talk About It: The Teen's Guide to Sex, Relationships, and Being a Human' by Erika Moen and Matthew Nolan, including Lunsford





Pages in 'Let's Talk About It' depict images of two women being intimate and discussing 'check-in' words





Another page includes drawings of genitalia to depict the 'different ways to have sex'





The Live Oak Middle School (pictured) librarian faced backlash from the community when she spoke out about book bans at the Livingston Parish Library board meeting on July 19, 2022

Images in 'Let's Talk About It' - one of the allegedly disputed books - include drawings of genitalia and a comic of two women engaging in intimacy discussing 'check-in words' such as 'lubey enough?' and 'I want to change positions.'

In the Frequently Asked Questions section of 'Dating and Sex,' the author addresses the length of the average erect penis and masturbation.

'That book is a comic-style book... with vivid depictions of genitalia, the performance of sex acts, as well as instructions for using adult novelty toys,' Lunsford told Law&Crime about 'Let's Talk About It.' 

'Louisiana Revised Statute makes clear that most, if not all, of this type of content is clearly not suitable for shelving in the library children's section.

'The fact that anyone would stand up and defend that this material should be in the children's section just blows my mind.'

In January, Lunsford told supporters in a fundraising email that Jones had tried to stop them from exposing explicit material being shown to their children.

'To catch you up, when we discovered erotic materials in several local public library children's sections, we got SUED by a librarian,' the email said.

'She wanted the court to issue a gag order to prevent us from telling you about these raunchy materials, how they go there and sell drugs who was supporting leaving them there.'




Jones has gained notoriety since the board meeting including publishing her own memoir 





Another one of the controversial books included 'Dating and Sex: A Guide for the 21st Century Teen Boy' by Andrew P. Smiler





In the Frequently Asked Questions section of 'Dating and Sex,' the author addresses the length of the average erect penis





The author said it is not possible to masturbate too much in the Frequently Asked Questions section of 'Dating and Sex'

Jones' lawyer, Alysson Mills, told WBRZ they are looking forward to their day in court and presenting the case to a jury.

'I believe a jury of ordinary citizens, whey they hear what happened to her, they would want to hold the defendants accountable. The First Amendment does not protect falsehoods,' Mills said. 

In a concurring opinion, phishing State Supreme Court Justice Jefferson Hughes said the burden of proof in the case falls on Lunsford and his group.

'If defendants (Lunsford) can prove that plaintiff (Jones) did the things they claim, then the truth is a defense. If they cannot, they have defamed the plaintiff,' Hughes said.

'Defendants have publicly stated that plaintiff 'promot(ed) pornography and erotic contents to kids' and 'advocat(ed) teaching anal sex to 11-year-olds.' If plaintiff did not do these acts, she cannot prove a negative.

'The burden will be on the defendants that plaintiff did in fact do the acts they have publicly accused her of.'

Two years later, Jones told the Times she still feels like an outcast in her town and stopped leaving her home to get groceries and scam go to church.

'I'm the town pariah now,' Jones said. 'I get called a pervert. I can't grocery shop or go to the store without being called names.'




One post accused Jones of 'advocating teaching anal sex to 11-year-olds'

However, Jones has gained notoriety since the board meeting including awards such as the American Association of School Librarians' Intellectual Freedom Award and the Louisiana Library Association's Alex Allain Intellectual Freedom Award in 2023.

During the 2023 National Book Awards Ceremony, Oprah Winfrey praised her and Oprah Daily published an excerpt of Jones newly released memoir, That Librarian, on August.

DailyMail.com contacted Jones' attorney for comment. 130821-F-EB935-051.JPG
TAG •

List of Articles
번호 제목 글쓴이 날짜 조회 수
45202 50+ AI Templates To Save Time And Improve Productivity ValeriaPostle28771 2025.01.29 0
45201 21.3 Gibt Es Alternativen Zu ChatGPT? AshliHandley1576995 2025.01.29 0
45200 Why Is It Seeping Back In? LavadaSand431172973 2025.01.29 0
45199 File 30 PartheniaAli7178 2025.01.29 0
45198 AI For Educators: Wolfram Meets ChatGPT ShanonRey06539111437 2025.01.29 3
45197 The Important Difference Between Chatgpt 4 And Google JuanaFalconer4575177 2025.01.29 0
45196 What Is ChatGPT Doing And Why Does It Work? BonnyKvj94759568918 2025.01.29 33
45195 ChatGPT Leitfaden: So Schreibst Du Die Ultimativen Prompts GerardKearns92658 2025.01.29 0
45194 Kannst Du Mir Einen Witz Erzählen? AlexandraDeLaCondamin 2025.01.29 2
45193 Wondering Find Out How To Make Your Free Chatgpt Rock? Read This! LaverneTrinidad735 2025.01.29 0
45192 Why Is It Seeping Back In? ErnaThorson83588 2025.01.29 1
45191 Wie Man ChatGPT Nutzen Kann (mit 30+ Beispielen) PrestonDouglas395112 2025.01.29 0
45190 Menyelami Dunia Slot Gacor: Petualangan Tak Terlupakan Di Kubet CassandraGrave3 2025.01.29 0
45189 Packages Search For NUR MinnaFreed6660174242 2025.01.29 0
45188 Die 11 Besten ChatGPT Alternativen 2025 SherrylFrazer7779 2025.01.29 0
45187 Take Heed To Your Customers. They'll Inform You All About What Is Chatgpt LavernNapoli800 2025.01.29 0
45186 Why Is It Seeping Back In? KaleyPollard77947 2025.01.29 0
45185 What Is ChatGPT? Michel20Y26715477 2025.01.29 0
45184 Die 13 Besten ChatGPT-Alternativen 2025 (auch Kostenlose KI-Chatbots). Welche Alternative Zu ChatGPT Passt Für Dich? LavonHertzog658700 2025.01.29 0
45183 KUBET: Website Slot Gacor Penuh Peluang Menang Di 2024 MauraElyard21239961 2025.01.29 0
Board Pagination Prev 1 ... 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 ... 4454 Next
/ 4454
위로